新自由主义 奇怪的存活 The Strange Non-Death Of Neo-Liberalism 英文原版 Colin Crouch Wiley caj kindle 百度云 azw3 夸克云 下载 pdb pdf

The financial crisis seemed to present a fundamental challenge to neo-liberalism, the body of ideas that have constituted the political orthodoxy of most advanced economies in recent decades. Colin Crouch argues in this book that it will shrug off this challenge. The reason is that while neo-liberalism seems to be about free markets, in practice it is concerned with the dominance over public life of the giant corporation. This has been intensified, not checked, by the recent financial crisis and acceptance that certain financial corporations are ‘too big to fail'. Although much political debate remains preoccupied with conflicts between the market and the state, the impact of the corporation on both these is today far more important. Several factors have brought us to this situation: Most obviously, the lobbying power of firms whose donations are of growing importance to cash-hungry politicians and parties; The weakening of competitive forces by firms large enough to shape and dominate their markets; The power over public policy exercised by corporations enjoying special relationships with government as they contract to deliver public services; The moral initiative that is grasped by enterprises that devise their own agendas of corporate social responsibility. Both democratic politics and the free market are weakened by these processes, but they are largely inevitable and not always malign. Hope for the future, therefore, cannot lie in suppressing them in order to attain either an economy of pure markets or a socialist society. Rather it lies in dragging the giant corporation fully into political controversy. Here a key role is played by the small, cash-strapped campaigning groups who, with precious little help from established parties, seek to achieve corporate social accountability.

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：新自由主义 奇怪的存活 The Strange Non-Death Of Neo-Liberalism 英文原版 Colin Crouch Wiley在线阅读

在线听书地址：新自由主义 奇怪的存活 The Strange Non-Death Of Neo-Liberalism 英文原版 Colin Crouch Wiley在线收听

在线购买地址：新自由主义 奇怪的存活 The Strange Non-Death Of Neo-Liberalism 英文原版 Colin Crouch Wiley在线购买

（新自由主义）背后都有一个突出的主张：自由市场可以保证个人物质利益的最大化，从而为实现人类福祉提供最佳的手段。政府或政治家的任何干预措施，要么效率低下，要么威胁市场的自由运行。所以，政府和政治家皆不应干预经济生活，由市场自行其是才会产生最好的结果。

已经实际存在而不是仅仅属于空想的新自由主义宣称对自由市场做出了巨大的贡献，但事实根本不是这样。

凯恩斯主义所代表的阶层--西方工业社会的体力劳动者--的社会影响正在出现历史性衰退。与此相反，从新自由主义思想中获益良多的利益集团--巨型企业，尤其是金融业的巨型企业--的社会影响却丝毫没有受损。

新自由主义认为银行业对新世纪美国经济的发展至关重要，所以必须千方百计地保护银行，使银行不用为自己的愚蠢行为埋单。与此同时，大多数同样深受危机影响的其他行业都没有得到保护。

民意可能代表大多数人的观点，但民意得以畅通表达所需的资源却主要掌握在少数富有的人手中。

“新自由主义”的名字……背后都有一个突出的主张：自由市场可以保证个人物质利益的最大化，从而为实现人类福祉提供最佳的手段。政府或政治家的任何干预措施，要么效率低下，要么威胁市场的自由运行。所以，政府和政治家皆不应干预经济生活，由市场自行其是才会产生最好的结果。

书籍介绍

The financial crisis seemed to present a fundamental challenge to neo-liberalism, the body of ideas that have constituted the political orthodoxy of most advanced economies in recent decades. Colin Crouch argues in this book that it will shrug off this challenge. The reason is that while neo-liberalism seems to be about free markets, in practice it is concerned with the dominance over public life of the giant corporation. This has been intensified, not checked, by the recent financial crisis and acceptance that certain financial corporations are ‘too big to fail'. Although much political debate remains preoccupied with conflicts between the market and the state, the impact of the corporation on both these is today far more important. Several factors have brought us to this situation: Most obviously, the lobbying power of firms whose donations are of growing importance to cash-hungry politicians and parties; The weakening of competitive forces by firms large enough to shape and dominate their markets; The power over public policy exercised by corporations enjoying special relationships with government as they contract to deliver public services; The moral initiative that is grasped by enterprises that devise their own agendas of corporate social responsibility. Both democratic politics and the free market are weakened by these processes, but they are largely inevitable and not always malign. Hope for the future, therefore, cannot lie in suppressing them in order to attain either an economy of pure markets or a socialist society. Rather it lies in dragging the giant corporation fully into political controversy. Here a key role is played by the small, cash-strapped campaigning groups who, with precious little help from established parties, seek to achieve corporate social accountability.